Piano and Music Videos

Welcome to LivingPianos.com, I’m Robert Estrin. The question today is, “Why do you play too fast?”. Most people try to play faster than they’re comfortable. Sometimes you will have a piece you can play just fine, but when you try to play it slower, you can’t even figure out where you are! There’s a great deal of motor memory or muscle memory that is involved in piano playing. Your fingers just seem to know where to go. So you want to go fast enough that you won’t forget where to go next. The problem with this is, unless the music is really secure, your tempo will fluctuate. You’ll make accommodations to the parts you don’t know quite as well, going a little slower. Then you’ll speed up again so you don’t forget where you are.

Motor memory on the piano is akin to touch typing.

I took a typing class in high school. I learned how to touch-type, so I don’t have to look at the keys. Little did I know, that would be probably the most important course I had in high school! In the computer age, it’s so great to be able to type without looking at your hands. But the funny thing is, if I stop and think where a letter is on the keyboard, for example, the letter “W”, I don’t even know! I have to look at the keyboard. If I have to type on a screen, where the keyboard is smaller, and you have to just touch the letters on the screen with your finger, I can’t even find them! Yet on a keyboard, I can type almost as fast as I can speak. I’m a really fast typist. I was the fastest in my class in high school. I guess all those years of piano paid off in my typing class!

Playing the piano too fast is a rampant problem among many piano students.

What you must do is take the time to slow down your playing and figure out what is there. This can be a painstaking process. I’ve talked a little bit about how sometimes when you want to start in the middle of a piece, you may have to speed up just to figure out what fingers to start with. When you’re playing slowly, you might want to play faster just a little bit at first, just to see where you are, and what fingers are on which notes as a starting point of a section.

Every fine pianist I have ever met practices slowly, incessantly.

There are three things that every accomplished pianist does: practice slowly, practice with a metronome, and practice without the pedal. I’ll also add to that, practice with the music! When you memorize a piece, that doesn’t mean you don’t use the score anymore. As a matter of fact, it’s the opposite. I like to memorize a piece first and then do all my practicing with the score, reinforcing the memory, practicing slowly with the metronome with no pedal and really solidifying.

The reason why you play too fast is because you’re not really cognizant of the score.

You play too fast because you don’t really have an intellectual understanding of the score. You’re just going through the motions. Your fingers kind of remember on their own without knowing what they’re supposed to be doing. But that’s extremely dangerous. It doesn’t have a solid foundation. Things can fall apart if you depend upon that type of playing. Thank goodness we do have motor memory! Piano would be so much more difficult if you couldn’t depend upon it at all. But you want to minimize your reliance upon the feeling of the keys and where your fingers naturally go. Slow, deliberate playing is the way to do it. Refer back to the score.

Try slow, deliberate practicing for yourself!

Take a piece that you can play fast, but you can’t play slowly with security. Take out the score and play slowly. You’re going to discover so many things! You will always find more details than you initially remembered. Your music has so many details in it! Let me know how it works for you here in the comments on LivingPianos.com and YouTube. Thanks again for joining me, Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Resource.

For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel! www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin

Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com

Welcome to LivingPianos.com, I’m Robert Estrin. The subject today is about when music is off the beat. Now you might be thinking, “Music that’s off the beat? Maybe it’s jazz or ragtime, like The Entertainer.” But that’s not what this is about at all. This is about hemiola. There are a lot of examples of syncopated rhythms where emphasis is on the weak beats or off the beat entirely on the “ands”, but hemiola is different. There is a great example of hemiola in the Kuhlau Sonatina Opus 55, No. 1. In the second movement there’s a big chromatic scale going up. When it gets to the very top, that’s when the hemiola begins.

You probably have come across hemiola in your music and wondered how to count it, and why composers even utilize it.

Listen to a little bit of the Kuhlau Sonatina. Do you hear the way it comes down after the chromatic scale? The grouping of notes overlap the beats. It’s kind of odd. It’s actually a pattern of two that is superimposed on this piece which is in three. So you don’t have the comfort of the downbeat at the beginning of each pattern. That, in a nutshell, is what hemiola is. It can be a very effective technique for giving a rhythmic accent that you don’t expect in music.

How do you approach hemiola?

You must count and you must count correctly! If you succumb to the hemiola and let it trick you into thinking in a different time signature where the hemiola is, it’ll mess you up. You must maintain the integrity of the time signature in hemiola. You don’t have to accent the beats. You can play it and let it be a flourish that’s off the beat even though you’re counting it correctly. It’s a wonderful compositional technique. I want all of you to check out your scores. Find places you think you might have hemiola. You’re welcome to share them in the comments here on LivingPianos.com and YouTube. I hope this is enjoyable for you and provides some insights into your music. Thanks again for joining me, Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Resource.

For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel! www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin

Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com

Welcome to LivingPianos.com, I’m Robert Estrin. The subject today is about how great music is storytelling. This has many ramifications. For example, a great piece of music sometimes evokes images and emotions that can tell a story. It may not tell a story with words as much as with feeling and direction. Interestingly, this is also true of great improvisations. For example, listen to a great jazz pianist crafting a ballad. As it unfolds, it can remind you of so many things in your life that you can’t even put into words. That’s what’s so great about music!

A performance can sometimes tell a story.

What I’m going to do today is something a little bit different. I thought I’d challenge myself and play the beginning of Chopin’s G Minor Ballade. I will play it twice. The first time, I’m going to try to play it absolutely faithfully to the score. The second time I’m going to try to tell a story. I’ll let the notes evoke something to make you feel it’s going somewhere and keep you on the edge of your seat, wondering where it’s going next. Can this really be done? I’m going to see if I can play this absolutely accurately the first time. Then, I’m going to go back and see if I can do something more than that and tell a story with the same exact notes, markings, rhythms, and phrasing. I will add subtlety of emotion that can somehow transcend the notes. Is this possible? This is what this experiment is about today.

It’s just like the lines of a play.

The lines of a play can be read in so many different ways. Everything the playwright wrote is in there, yet each actor has a completely different feeling and tells a different story. That’s what I’m going to attempt to do now. I’ll see if I can take the same passage of music with all the same markings, the same notes, rhythm, fingering, phrasing, and expression and see if I can tell more than what is on the page.

See video for my performances of the beginning of Chopin’s G Minor Ballade.

I wonder, could you hear a difference? I’m really interested in your opinions of these two different performances. They both are accurate from a technical standpoint, all the notes that Chopin wrote were in both of them. I’m wondering what your feelings are about them, if they evoke different senses. Do they tell different stories? That’s what music is all about. It’s telling stories that can’t be told with words – stories of emotion. That’s what I believe. I’m wondering how many of you feel the same way, and what these two different snippets of the Chopin G Minor Ballade did for you. Let me know in the comments, on LivingPianos.com, as well as on YouTube. Thanks again for joining me, Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Resource.

For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel! www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin

Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com

Supplemental Content:
Chopin Ballade #1 in G-Minor on Steinway Model D Concert Grand

Welcome to LivingPianos.com, I’m Robert Estrin. The subject today is about how to figure out rhythms by counting. It’s essential to count rhythms so you know the timing of a piece of music. There’s a lot that we can talk about here. The number one fundamental is understanding time signatures. Time signatures tell you how to count a piece in the first place! What’s counting all about? Well, a carpenter has a tape measure right on their belt. They check their work constantly by measuring. The way we measure in music is by counting.

If you don’t count, you’re just guessing rhythms.

Maybe you have a good sense of rhythm. You can listen to recordings and get an idea of what the rhythm is like. But how do you know the recordings are even right? Suppose it’s a piece that has no recordings? At some point or another, you want to be able to figure out rhythms, and counting is the answer for that.

First, you look at the time signature. The time signature contains two numbers and is found at the beginning of every piece of music. The top number tells you how many beats are in each measure. The bottom number stands for the kind of note getting one beat. So if the bottom number is a four, that stands for the quarter note getting one beat. If the bottom number is a two, the half note gets one beat. If the bottom number is an eight, the eighth note gets one beat. If the bottom number is a one, the whole note gets one beat. So that’s what the bottom number tells you.

So if you have a piece of music in 4/4 time, you would count, one, two, three, four. If you have quarter notes in 4/4 time, there would be one note on each beat. If you have half notes, there will be notes on the first and third beats. But the counting never changes.

Never change the style of counting within a piece of music.

The counting must remain consistent! That’s how it measures accurately. Imagine if you had a tape measure that had inches marked in some places but in other places had multiples of six inches marked without the inches marked anymore. It would be very confusing! So, no matter what types of notes you have, the counting remains consistent. Once you embrace this fundamental concept, figuring out rhythms will become a breeze!

A simple tune like, Mary Had a Little Lamb is in 4/4 time and contains mostly quarter notes and half notes, as well as a whole note at the end. This is a very simple rhythm. But most rhythms are quite a bit more complex.

What do you do if you have eighth notes in 4/4 time or in 3/4 time for that matter?

There are two eighth notes in each quarter note and the quarter note gets one beat. So an eighth note gets half a beat. You count half beats by saying and between the numbers. So for a piece in 3/4 time you would count, one and two and three and one and two and three and, et cetera. So you know exactly where all the notes come in.

What if you have 16th notes in 2/4 time? There are four 16th notes to each beat, so you must divide the beat into four parts. Since you’ve already divided the beats in half, you just need to divide the halves in half. For that you use u.. One u and u two u and u one u and u two u and u. So, if you are in 2/4 time and you have 16th notes, you would have one note for each syllable. Eighth notes still come in where they did before, on the numbers as well as the ands. Likewise, the quarter notes come in where they did before, just on the numbers. Of course you could have half notes, which would get whole measures.

Now you can see that it can be a real mouthful counting like this! As long as your counting remains consistent, you can count just with numbers as well as ands, or even just the numbers. So, in order to figure out exactly what rhythms are, first count with all the subdivisions. But as the music goes faster, you can just think the subdivisions while counting only the numbers. But you must always think the subdivisions, particularly in dotted rhythms. If something is fast, the subdivisions must be precise. Eventually, you can work with a metronome and just count the subdivisions in your head.

Sometimes you have triple divisions of the beat!

Counting this is a little bit different. Something in 6/8 time is, one two three – four five six, one two three – four five six. When going much faster, you may only count the first and fourth beat. You may just count in two. In that case the one represents the first beat, and the two represents the fourth beat.

With polyrhythms, things can get quite different, and you may have really fast notes. Sometimes your best bet is to write-in lines in your music where the beats are which can also help you determine which notes play together with both hands. But those complex rhythmic situations are a subject for another video.

For most rhythms, simply counting them out is the answer for you.

I hope this has clarified things for you, or was at least a good reminder for everybody to remember to count your music. There’s nothing worse than listening to somebody play something where the beats are not consistent. You lose the foundation of the music. Counting is a great way for you to figure out any rhythm! Thanks again for joining me. I’m Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Resource.

For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel! www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin

Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com

Hi, I’m Robert Estrin and this is LivingPianos.com. Today I’m going to show you fingering tips for the piano. Fingering on the piano is as much art as it is science. It is a complex subject. There isn’t one right fingering for everyone. But there are a lot of fingerings that are definitely better than other fingerings. I’m going to give you some general guidelines. Keep in mind that this is a deep subject. These are guidelines that you can take to heart, but finding fingering solutions is something that involves a lifetime of discovery.

To find appropriate fingering, try to cover as many notes in a passage as possible.

Avoid unnecessary finger crossings. If you can be over a whole chord and have your fingers play those notes, it is far easier than having to cross over unnecessarily. There are some exceptions to this. Sometimes you might find that by playing over a chord, it’s hard to get enough power and speed. You might find you want to do finger crossings. But generally you can just get over as many notes as possible in a hand position because it’s easy to play once you’re over the notes. Thumb crossings and third and fourth finger crossings can be difficult to achieve. So get over as many notes as possible.

Unless you’re playing octaves or chords, generally you avoid the thumb on black keys.

Every single rule I’m going to tell you has exceptions. If you’re playing a Bach fugue for example, where counterpoint is very complex, you’ll have the craziest fingering you could ever imagine that breaks every single rule I’m going to tell you here today. So these are only guidelines that you try first. If you can accomplish fingering without using the thumb on black keys, do so. Now of course, if they’re in chords or octaves, that rule does not apply.

On repeated notes you must change fingers.

Obviously, for fast repeated notes it’s essential to change fingers. There’s no way anybody could play fast repeated notes with one finger. But what about repeated notes that are slow? In order to get a true legato out of repeated notes you must change fingers, so one finger is going down while the other finger is going up. For example, the beginning of the second movement of the K 330 C Major Sonata of Mozart. It starts off with three C’s. Without changing fingers, you end up with breaks between the notes. Changing the fingers on those notes makes it possible to achieve a smooth legato sound. You can add the pedal to enhance it. But you can achieve that beautiful legato just with your fingers by changing fingers for each note.

There isn’t just one fingering for all players.

People’s hands are built differently. Not just the size, but the angle of the thumb, as well as the length of different fingers. For some people, the thumb is at a greater angle offering a wider reach. The thickness of fingers can also determine what fingering works best. So every player has to discover what fingerings work for them.

Find the fingerings that work for you!

You must experiment with different fingerings in order to find what works for you. In fact, I will go so far as to say that whenever you have a technical problem, you should search for a fingering solution.

Reference different scores that are edited with different fingering suggestions.

You’ll find if you have more than one edition of a piece, the fingerings are not the same. Different editors have different ideas about what fingerings are going to work best. Sometimes you’re tearing your hair out, not able to play a passage, and then you find another book that has a different fingering and it instantly solves the problem for you!

Those are some tips for fingering for you!

I’m sure there are other valuable tips out there. If anybody has any more tips, leave them in the comments here at LivingPianos.com or on YouTube. I’m Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Resource.

For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel! www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin

Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com

Welcome to LivingPianos.com, I’m Robert Estrin. The question today is, does staccato mean short? You know the dots over or under notes? When you see them, you think you’re supposed to play those notes short, right? For example, in Clementi Sonatina Opus 36, Number One, the famous sonatina. I know not all additions have staccatos, but they should because it sounds really good playing crisp, short staccatos. So does staccato mean short? Staccato does not mean short! So why are staccatos played short then? Well, they aren’t always played short.

Staccato actually means detached.

Staccato is the opposite of a slur. Slurs are played smoothly and connected. Staccato tells you to detach the notes. Now, in a fast tempo like the Clementi Sonatina Opus 36, Number One, they’re going to be short. But have you ever had a slow piece with a staccatos? What does that mean? Well, oftentimes composers will write notes with rests between them if they want really short staccatos in a slow tempo. So if you had 4/4 time and half notes with staccatos, instead of writing half notes with staccatos, they might write a quarter note with a staccato followed by a quarter rest, then another staccato quarter note followed by a quarter rest, and so on. So you have quarter note, quarter rest, quarter note, quarter rest, which already gives you some separation. And if they’re staccato, you would play them even shorter, ostensibly.

In some instances you detach notes without playing them short.

I’m going to give you an example where there are half notes in a fast tempo, something in 2/2 time, the famous Pathetique Sonata of Beethoven. After the opening slow section, it goes to an Allegro. It’s really fast, and you have staccato quarter notes followed by staccato half notes. Should it be played with all the notes equally short? Well, half notes shouldn’t really be short. Should they be detached? Absolutely! The way I interpret this is to play those half notes like quarter notes followed by quarter rests. This way they have some length, but there’s space between them. You play the quarter notes short, because at a fast tempo,it’s very difficult to detach the quarter notes without playing them short. But you can detach the half notes without playing them short. That is what Beethoven intended, I believe. But this is only one aspect and one place.

Generally, slow movement staccatos are longer notes that are detached, and fast movement staccatos are played short and crisp.

When you have staccatos in a slow movement, they are not generally to be played short. It’s out of character. The staccatos simply mean to detach the notes. Now, there are always exceptions. Context is everything! I showed you an exception right here where Beethoven writes staccatos on half notes. So take this with a grain of salt. Look at what makes sense in the score. Why would a composer write staccatos on half notes? It doesn’t make much sense for them to be as short as the staccato quarter notes, does it?

I’m interested in hearing from all of you about this! I’m happy to answer any questions you have about staccatos in any context! I’m Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Resource.

For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel! www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin

Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com